The debug code in memblock uses wrongly the %pF instead of the %pS printk
format specifier for printing symbols for the address returned by
_builtin_return_address(0)/_RET_IP_. Fix it for the ia64, ppc64 and parisc64
architectures.

Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <del...@gmx.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux...@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 mm/memblock.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 9120578..7f1590d 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, 
phys_addr_t size)
 {
        phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
 
-       memblock_dbg("memblock_add: [%pa-%pa] %pF\n",
+       memblock_dbg("memblock_add: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
                     &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
 
        return memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 
0);
@@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, 
phys_addr_t size)
 {
        phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
 
-       memblock_dbg("   memblock_free: [%pa-%pa] %pF\n",
+       memblock_dbg("   memblock_free: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
                     &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
 
        kmemleak_free_part_phys(base, size);
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, 
phys_addr_t size)
 {
        phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
 
-       memblock_dbg("memblock_reserve: [%pa-%pa] %pF\n",
+       memblock_dbg("memblock_reserve: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
                     &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
 
        return memblock_add_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 
0);
@@ -1362,7 +1362,7 @@ void * __init memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid_nopanic(
                                phys_addr_t min_addr, phys_addr_t max_addr,
                                int nid)
 {
-       memblock_dbg("%s: %llu bytes align=0x%llx nid=%d from=0x%llx 
max_addr=0x%llx %pF\n",
+       memblock_dbg("%s: %llu bytes align=0x%llx nid=%d from=0x%llx 
max_addr=0x%llx %pS\n",
                     __func__, (u64)size, (u64)align, nid, (u64)min_addr,
                     (u64)max_addr, (void *)_RET_IP_);
        return memblock_virt_alloc_internal(size, align, min_addr,
@@ -1394,7 +1394,7 @@ void * __init memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid(
 {
        void *ptr;
 
-       memblock_dbg("%s: %llu bytes align=0x%llx nid=%d from=0x%llx 
max_addr=0x%llx %pF\n",
+       memblock_dbg("%s: %llu bytes align=0x%llx nid=%d from=0x%llx 
max_addr=0x%llx %pS\n",
                     __func__, (u64)size, (u64)align, nid, (u64)min_addr,
                     (u64)max_addr, (void *)_RET_IP_);
        ptr = memblock_virt_alloc_internal(size, align,
@@ -1418,7 +1418,7 @@ void * __init memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid(
  */
 void __init __memblock_free_early(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
 {
-       memblock_dbg("%s: [%#016llx-%#016llx] %pF\n",
+       memblock_dbg("%s: [%#016llx-%#016llx] %pS\n",
                     __func__, (u64)base, (u64)base + size - 1,
                     (void *)_RET_IP_);
        kmemleak_free_part_phys(base, size);
@@ -1438,7 +1438,7 @@ void __init __memblock_free_late(phys_addr_t base, 
phys_addr_t size)
 {
        u64 cursor, end;
 
-       memblock_dbg("%s: [%#016llx-%#016llx] %pF\n",
+       memblock_dbg("%s: [%#016llx-%#016llx] %pS\n",
                     __func__, (u64)base, (u64)base + size - 1,
                     (void *)_RET_IP_);
        kmemleak_free_part_phys(base, size);
-- 
2.1.0

Reply via email to