On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 10:34:34AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 02/09/2017 04:54, Leo Yan wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:47:32AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> The TEMP0_CFG configuration register contains different field to set up the
> >> temperature controller. However in the code, nothing prevents a setup to
> >> overwrite the previous one: eg. writing the hdak value overwrites the
> >> sensor
> >> selection, the sensor selection overwrites the hdak value.
> >>
> >> In order to prevent such thing, use a regmap-like mechanism by reading the
> >> value before, set the corresponding bits and write the result.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/thermal/hisi_thermal.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/hisi_thermal.c
> >> b/drivers/thermal/hisi_thermal.c
> >> index d77a938..3e03908 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/thermal/hisi_thermal.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/thermal/hisi_thermal.c
> >> @@ -132,19 +132,39 @@ static inline void hisi_thermal_enable(void __iomem
> >> *addr, int value)
> >> writel(value, addr + TEMP0_EN);
> >> }
> >>
> >> -static inline void hisi_thermal_sensor_select(void __iomem *addr, int
> >> sensor)
> >> +static inline int hisi_thermal_get_temperature(void __iomem *addr)
> >> {
> >> - writel((sensor << 12), addr + TEMP0_CFG);
> >> + return hisi_thermal_step_to_temp(readl(addr + TEMP0_VALUE));
> >> }
> >>
> >> -static inline int hisi_thermal_get_temperature(void __iomem *addr)
> >> +/*
> >> + * Temperature configuration register - Sensor selection
> >> + *
> >> + * Bits [19:12]
> >> + *
> >> + * 0x0: local sensor (default)
> >> + * 0x1: remote sensor 1 (ACPU cluster 1)
> >> + * 0x2: remote sensor 2 (ACPU cluster 0)
> >> + * 0x3: remote sensor 3 (G3D)
> >> + */
> >> +static inline void hisi_thermal_sensor_select(void __iomem *addr, int
> >> sensor)
> >> {
> >> - return hisi_thermal_step_to_temp(readl(addr + TEMP0_VALUE));
> >> + writel(readl(addr + TEMP0_CFG) | (sensor << 12), addr + TEMP0_CFG);
> >
> > nitpick: maybe it's better to firstly clear related bits and then set
> > value?
>
> Sorry, I don't get the comment. Can you elaborate ?
Sure, here I am bit concern there the mixing old bits value and new
setting bits. My suggested code likes below:
u32 val;
val = readl(addr + TEMP0_CFG);
val &= ~0xF000;
val |= (sensor << 12);
writel(val, addr + TEMP0_CFG);
Thanks,
Leo Yan
