On 18 August 2017 at 09:36, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 18 August 2017 at 09:26, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> * Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>>> -static void for_each_tracepoint_range(struct tracepoint * const *begin,
>>> - struct tracepoint * const *end,
>>> +static void for_each_tracepoint_range(const void *begin, const void *end,
>>> void (*fct)(struct tracepoint *tp, void *priv),
>>> void *priv)
>>> {
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PREL32_RELOCATIONS
>>> + const signed int *iter;
>>> +
>>> + if (!begin)
>>> + return;
>>> + for (iter = begin; iter < (signed int *)end; iter++) {
>>> + fct((struct tracepoint *)((unsigned long)iter + *iter), priv);
>>> + }
>>
>> I think checkpatch is correct here to complain about the unnecessary curly
>> braces
>> here.
>>
>
> Fair enough. I will clean up to the extent feasible.
>
OK, in an honest attempt to at least remove as many of the checkpatch
errors as I can, I am running into the paradoxical situation where I
either get
ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxO)
#83: FILE: include/linux/init.h:232:
+#define console_initcall(fn) ___define_initcall(fn,, .con_initcall)
or
ERROR: space prohibited before that ',' (ctx:WxW)
#156: FILE: include/linux/init.h:232:
+#define console_initcall(fn) ___define_initcall(fn, , .con_initcall)
^
which I think may be checkpatch trying to give me a hint that I have
done enough work for the week, and should spend some time by the pool
instead.
