* Boqun Feng <boqun.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > BTW., I don't think the #ifdef is necessary: lockdep_init_map_crosslock
> > should map
> > to nothing when lockdep is disabled, right?
>
> IIUC, lockdep_init_map_crosslock is only defined when
> CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE=y,
Then lockdep_init_map_crosslock() should be defined in the !LOCKDEP case as
well.
> [...] moreover, completion::map, which used as
> the parameter of lockdep_init_map_crosslock(), is only defined when
> CONFIG_LOCKDEP_COMPLETE=y.
If the !LOCKDEP wrapper is a CPP macro then it can ignore that parameter just
fine, and it won't be built.
Thanks,
Ingo
