Michal Hocko wrote: > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c > index 544d47e5cbbd..86a48affb938 100644 > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c > @@ -1896,7 +1896,7 @@ static int try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t > gfp_mask, > * bypass the last charges so that they can exit quickly and > * free their memory. > */ > - if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE) || > + if (unlikely(tsk_is_oom_victim(current) || > fatal_signal_pending(current) || > current->flags & PF_EXITING)) > goto force;
Did we check http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160909140508.go4...@dhcp22.suse.cz ? > diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c > index c9f3569a76c7..65cc2f9aaa05 100644 > --- a/mm/oom_kill.c > +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c > @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ static bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct task_struct *tsk, > struct mm_struct *mm) > * [...] > * out_of_memory > * select_bad_process > - * # no TIF_MEMDIE task selects new > victim > + * # no TIF_MEMDIE, selects new victim > * unmap_page_range # frees some memory > */ > mutex_lock(&oom_lock); This comment is wrong. No MMF_OOM_SKIP mm selects new victim.
