On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 15:17 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:27:12 +0000 : > I didn't try to inject an error, as I'm not sure if EINJ feature is > enabled on this BIOS. Probably not.
I believe it has EINJ support. > At least on this machine, I very much prefer to use sb_edac driver. > > As I explained earlier in the previous thread, I just don't if the > BIOS would be doing the right thing for CE, as I don't know its > internal algorithm. > > Also, as I'm maintaining the EDAC userspace tools (rasdaemon), > I would really love to get a few CE error reports there from time to > time, as it could be used to check if rasdaemon is doing do the right > thing to them. > > So, I very much prefer to not have any threshold at all there at > BIOS. Using sb_edac does not change the fact that it is FF. I do not think you'd see normal CEs on your box. Thanks, -Toshi
