On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 14:58 -0500, Florin Iucha wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:09:42PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > See > > http://client.linux-nfs.org/Linux-2.6.x/2.6.21-rc7/ > > > > I'm giving the first 5 patches of that series (i.e. > > linux-2.6.21-001-cleanup_unstable_write.dif to > > linux-2.6.21-005-fix_nfsv4_resend.dif) an extra beating since those are > > the ones that I feel should go into 2.6.21 final in order to fix the > > read/write regressions that have been reported. They should be identical > > to the patches that I posted on lkml in the past 3 days. > > > > Please feel free to grab them and give them a test. > > The copy completed some time ago, but now I cannot ssh into the box! > This is a new development, as before I was always able to ssh into, > even when the copy slowed down to a trickle. > > I'm far from the machine right now, so I will do some more tests > tonight, but right now, the new patchset is not good. What is the > difference between reverting the patch you sent yesterday and your > current fifth patch? I assume the other four are identical, right?
The only difference is the way in which we handle retries of an NFSv4 request: the new patch disconnects if and only if a timeout has occurred, or the server sends us garbage. Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
