On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 08:30 -0500, Florin Iucha wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 04:49:31PM -0500, Florin Iucha wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:30:42PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > > I'm far from the machine right now, so I will do some more tests > > > > tonight, but right now, the new patchset is not good. What is the > > > > difference between reverting the patch you sent yesterday and your > > > > current fifth patch? I assume the other four are identical, right? > > > > > > The only difference is the way in which we handle retries of an NFSv4 > > > request: the new patch disconnects if and only if a timeout has > > > occurred, or the server sends us garbage. > > > > I have to mention that I rebased to the head of the tree > > (895e1fc7226e6732bc77138955b6c7dfa279f57a) before applying your > > patches, in order to test what I expect the official tree to be. > > > > Tonight I'll test this kernel once more, then go back to 21-rc7 and > > apply your 5 patches and re-test. > > It passed big-copy, and the copy run from the gnome-session while I > did my morning light browsing, email reading, etc. > > kernel: > 895e1fc7226e6732bc77138955b6c7dfa279f57a > > patches: > linux-2.6.21-001-cleanup_unstable_write.dif > linux-2.6.21-002-defer_clearing_pg_writeback.dif > linux-2.6.21-003-fix_desynchronised_ncommit.dif > linux-2.6.21-004-fix_nfs_set_page_dirty.dif > linux-2.6.21-005-fix_nfsv4_resend.dif > > Regards, > florin
Thanks! Did you ever find out what had happened to the test that hung last night? Cheers Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
