On 7/13/17 3:51 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Mimi Zohar (zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com): >> On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 08:39 -0400, Matt Brown wrote: >> The question is really from a security perspective which is better? >> Obviously, as v2 of the patch set changed from using pathnames to >> inodes, it's pretty clear that I think inodes would be better. Kees, >> Serge, Casey any comments? > > Yes, inode seems clearly better. Paths are too easily worked around. >
Sounds good. Do we think a rb_tree would be better than a list to store the inodes in? Matt
