On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Deepa Dinamani <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Mel Gorman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> >> >> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> > > Acked-by: Deepa Dinamani <[email protected]> > > As already Arnd pointed out, your patch should be fine as that is how > it was before my patch. Since nobody saw any problems before my patch, > lower granularity should be fine.
Agreed. Mel's patch basically restores the previous behavior while keeping the 64-bit timestamp size. Considering where we are at with the merge window, I'm going to merge this into the audit/next branch and not send this up to Linus during the current window; while the patch is small, I like to give things some time in linux-next before sending them up. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com
