2017-07-06 17:23 GMT+08:00 Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 02:16 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 17:01 +0800, Lin Zhang wrote:
>> > In the pull_pages code block, if the first frags size > eat,
>> > we can end the loop in advance to avoid extra copy.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Lin Zhang <xiaolou4...@gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> > net/core/skbuff.c | 4 ++++
>> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
>> > index f990eb8..c00a1df 100644
>> > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
>> > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
>> > @@ -1720,6 +1720,10 @@ void *__pskb_pull_tail(struct sk_buff *skb, int
>> > delta)
>> > skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[k].page_offset += eat;
>> > skb_frag_size_sub(&skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[k],
>> > eat);
>> > eat = 0;
>> > + if (!i) {
>> > + k = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
>> > + break;
>> > + }
>> > }
>> > k++;
>> > }
>>
>> 1) net-next is closed during merge window.
>>
>> 2) This change is completely buggy.
>> How have you tested it exactly ???
>
> Hmm... it looks like I was wrong, but 1) still applies ;)
>
>
>
>
thanks, i am a newer, "net-next is closed" it means i need repost it
after net-next reopened?
regards
--
Lin Zhang
