On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 01:27:13PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: ... > Now that you're agreeing my direction was correct you've done the usual Linux > kernel thing - ignore all my previous code and write your own version. Oh > well, that I've come to expect; at least you get a copyright notice in the > bootup and somewhere in the comments give me credit for proving it's > possible. Let's give some other credit here too. William Lee Irwin provided > the major architecture behind plugsched at my request and I simply finished > the work and got it working. He is also responsible for many IRC discussions > I've had about cpu scheduling fairness, designs, programming history and code > help. Even though he did not contribute code directly to SD, his comments > have been invaluable.
Hello folks, I think the main failure I see here is that Con wasn't included in this design or privately in review process. There could have been better co-ownership of the code. This could also have been done openly on lkml (since this is kind of what this medium is about to significant degree) so that consensus can happen (Con can be reasoned with). It would have achieved the same thing but probably more smoothly if folks just listened, considered an idea and then, in this case, created something that would allow for experimentation from outsiders in a fluid fashion. If these issues aren't fixed, you're going to stuck with the same kind of creeping elitism that has gradually killed the FreeBSD project and other BSDs. I can't comment on the code implementation. I'm focus on other things now that I'm at NetApp and I can't help out as much as I could. Being former BSDi, I had a first hand account of these issues as they played out. A development process like this is likely to exclude smart people from wanting to contribute to Linux and folks should be conscious about this issues. It's basically a lot of code and concept that at least two individuals have worked on (wli and con) only to have it be rejected and then sudden replaced by code from a community gatekeeper. In this case, this results in both Con and Bill Irwin being woefully under utilized. If I were one of these people. I'd be mighty pissed. bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
