On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 16:08 +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Ingo could have publicly spoken with them about his ideas of killing
> > the O(1) scheduler and replacing it with an rbtree-based one, and using
> > part of Bill's work to speed up development.
>
> He did exactly that and he did it with a patch. Nothing new here. This is
> how development on LKML proceeds when you have two or more competing
> designs. There's absolutely no need to get upset or hurt your feelings
> over it. It's not malicious, it's how we do Linux development.
Yes. Exactly. This is what it's all about, this is what makes it work.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
