Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 08:16:04 +0100 From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hmm. One of these weird bandwidth limiters again? In a more recent mail, TCP header compression in Win98 or Earthlink's terminal servers have become the current prime suspect. :-) The RTT is lower than 2.2's initial 3s RTT, so 2.2 would never see it. The 240 traces are using an RTT of 3s (look at the time difference of the first retransmit), so this is not it. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... David S. Miller
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... Jordan Mendelson
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... David S. Miller
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... Andi Kleen
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... Andi Kleen
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... Jordan Mendelson
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... Rogier Wolff
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 &... Andi Kleen
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... David S. Miller
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... Andi Kleen
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... David S. Miller
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> ... Rogier Wolff
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> Win98 SE PPP Jordan Mendelson
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> Win98 SE... David S. Miller