On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 10:03:05PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > The only thing I can do now is beg for a tcpdump from the windows95 > machine side. Do you have the facilities necessary to obtain this? > This would prove that it is packet drop between the two systems, for > whatever reason, that is causing this. It looks very like to me like a poster child for the non timestamp RTT update problem I just described on netdev. Linux always retransmits too early and there is never a better RTT estimate which could fix it. 2.4's advertised windows also do not seem to cope with weird window advertising strategy of windows (start with a small window and then suddenly increase it). Linux's stays small. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 &... Jordan Mendelson
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... David S. Miller
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... Jordan Mendelson
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... David S. Miller
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... Jordan Mendelson
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... David S. Miller
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... Andi Kleen
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... Andi Kleen
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... Jordan Mendelson
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... Rogier Wolff
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 &... Andi Kleen
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... David S. Miller
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... Andi Kleen
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-... David S. Miller
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> ... Rogier Wolff
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> Win98 SE PPP Jordan Mendelson
- Re: Poor TCP Performance 2.4.0-10 <-> Win98 SE... David S. Miller