* Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pi...@linaro.org> wrote:
> > But the kernel complexity you introduce with this series stays with us! It
> > will be an additional cost added to many scheduler commits going forward.
> > It's
> > an added cost for all the other usecases.
>
> OK, let's talk about that a bit. How isn't sched/core.c with its 7387
> lines not overly complex already? How is my moving of rt related code to
> rt.c and dl related code to dl.c not helping things? Isn't it easier to
> understand the 3500 lines of code in futex.c when half of it i.e. the PI
> specific code is split into a separate file? I ask you.
>
> If you want to pick only those patches for now then please be my guest.
> At lease the first two patches of the series should be mergeable without
> even a doubt.
That's a strawman argument - I was reacting to the combined effect of your
series:
> > > 23 files changed, 3190 insertions(+), 2897 deletions(-)
A subset of the patches might be fine and note that in fact I already picked a
patch from your series that made sense, I committed this patch of yours three
days
ago:
f5832c1998af: sched/core: Omit building stop_sched_class when !SMP
I'll pick others as well as long as they don't complicate the code. Please send
a
revised series that only does unambiguous complexity reduction/cleanups.
Thanks,
Ingo
