Em Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 11:04:33AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:54:50PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> >
> > + if (t->is_supported && !t->is_supported()) {
> > + pr_debug("%2d: %-*s: Disabled\n", i, width, t->desc);
>
> This isn't clear, I'll change this to leave the pr_debug up to the
> ->is_supported() code (that will receive the struct test pointer too),
> that can then say something more clear like what you put in that
> comment.
>
> This way, ppc hackers running 'perf test' will see that longstanding
> TODO entry ;-)
On a second thought, this can be done as a patch on top of yours, done
in perf/core, while your patch can go in perf/urgent.
- Arnaldo
> - Arnaldo
>
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > +
> > pr_info("%2d: %-*s:", i, width, t->desc);
> >
> > if (intlist__find(skiplist, i)) {
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/tests.h b/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
> > index 631859629403..577363809c9b 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/tests.h
> > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ struct test {
> > int (*get_nr)(void);
> > const char *(*get_desc)(int subtest);
> > } subtest;
> > + bool (*is_supported)(void);
> > };
> >
> > /* Tests */
> > @@ -99,6 +100,8 @@ const char *test__clang_subtest_get_desc(int subtest);
> > int test__clang_subtest_get_nr(void);
> > int test__unit_number__scnprint(int subtest);
> >
> > +bool test__bp_signal_is_supported(void);
> > +
> > #if defined(__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__)
> > #ifdef HAVE_DWARF_UNWIND_SUPPORT
> > struct thread;
> > --
> > 2.9.4
