On Saturday, 7 April 2007 11:47, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > We do in on_each_cpu() unconditionally. I missed that. > > > > BTW, the on_each_cpu() in clock_was_set() is unnecessary, because > > timekeeping_resume() is always run on one CPU. > > yes - but that's not the only place where we do clock_was_set(), and the > on_each_cpu() is necessary in every other case. So i think the right > solution was the patch i did: to split the resume functionality from the > clock_was_set() functionality.
Agreed. Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
