On Saturday, 7 April 2007 10:48, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 10:25 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > [...] Soeren, can you confirm that you are using a !CONFIG_SMP kernel, > > > and if yes, does the patch below fix the resume problem for you? > > > > hm, you seem to have a CONFIG_SMP=y kernel. I dont immediately see where > > we re-enable interrupts in the SMP case, but could you try my patch > > nevertheless > > We do in on_each_cpu() unconditionally. I missed that.
BTW, the on_each_cpu() in clock_was_set() is unnecessary, because timekeeping_resume() is always run on one CPU. Greetings, Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
