On Tue, 30 May 2017, Hugh Dickins <hu...@google.com> wrote: > On Mon, 22 May 2017, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: >> On la, 2017-05-20 at 10:56 +0900, J. R. Okajima wrote: >> > "J. R. Okajima": >> > > >> > > I don't know whether the fix is good to me or not yet. I will test your >> > > fix, but I am busy now and my test will be a few weeks later. Other >> > > people may want the fix soon. So I'd suggest you to reproduce the >> > > problem on your side. I guess "mem=1G" or "mem=512M" will make it easier >> > > to reproduce the problem. >> > > Of course, if you are sure the fix is correct, then you don't have to >> > > wait for my test. Release it soon for other people. >> > >> > Now I am going to able to run my local test. >> > But V3 patch failed to apply onto v4.11.0. >> > >> > Would you provide us two versions of the patch, one for v4.11 series and >> > the other of v4.12-rcN? >> >> For v4.12-rc2 the backport is here: >> >> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/156990/ > > This fix seems to have got lost: we've been waiting a month, > and 4.12 is now at rc3: please expedite the unexpedited :)
It's included in my latest pull request to Dave [1], should make it to v4.12-rc4. BR, Jani. [1] http://mid.mail-archive.com/877f0zlr5d.fsf@intel.com -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
