On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> writes: > > > On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > >> Sure. It would be nice to move ->children into signal_struct at first. > >> Except this change breaks (in fact fixes) ->pdeath_signal behaviour. > > > > Ohhh, the "signal" struct! Funny name for something that nowadays has > > probably no more than a 5% affinity with signal-related tasks :/ > > Hmm. I wonder if we should just rename it the struct thread_group, > or struct task_group. Those seem slightly more accurate names.
Almost *anything* is better than "signal_struct" ;) A task_group could be fine, so something on the line of task_shared_ctx. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
