Hello,
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:33:06PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Checkpatch reports following:
>
> WARNING: Prefer kmalloc_array over kmalloc with multiply
> + cpufreq_cdev->freq_table = kmalloc(sizeof(*cpufreq_cdev->freq_table) *
> i,
>
> Fix that.
That is how the patch would apply. Enter to continue
WARNING: line over 80 characters
#159: FILE: drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c:783:
+ cpufreq_cdev->freq_table = kmalloc(sizeof(*cpufreq_cdev->freq_table) *
i,
WARNING: Prefer kmalloc_array over kmalloc with multiply
#159: FILE: drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c:783:
+ cpufreq_cdev->freq_table = kmalloc(sizeof(*cpufreq_cdev->freq_table) *
i,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
WARNING: line over 80 characters
#190: FILE: include/linux/cpufreq.h:859:
+static inline int cpufreq_table_count_valid_entries(const struct
cpufreq_policy *policy)
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> index 1305020790b2..908a8014cf76 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> @@ -724,8 +724,9 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node *np,
> /* max_level is an index, not a counter */
> cpufreq_cdev->max_level = i - 1;
>
> - cpufreq_cdev->freq_table = kmalloc(sizeof(*cpufreq_cdev->freq_table) *
> i,
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> + cpufreq_cdev->freq_table = kmalloc_array(i,
> + sizeof(*cpufreq_cdev->freq_table),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!cpufreq_cdev->freq_table) {
> cdev = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> goto free_idle_time;
> --
> 2.13.0.70.g6367777092d9
>
