On 2017-05-22 19:36, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 2017-05-22 19:26, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On 2017-05-22 19:20, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On 2017-05-22 19:12, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>> And since there is no difference to the frequency the name is enough. >>>>> So, I wouldn't go with this series as is. See above. >>>> >>>> Nope: Just like for the stmmac, we need to include the asset tags to >>>> avoid matching variations of the devices which may carry the same board >>>> name. While I will try to avoid that this happens, we are better safe >>>> than sorry here. >>> >>> Do we have an issue right now? >>> Yes / No >> >> Andy, we are trying to design a robust upstream driver here, no ad-hoc >> BSP that will not survive the hardware anyway. > > You didn't answer my question... > > I do not see a good point to solve the issue that might happen in the future. >
While I do - that's why your question is misleading. Then let's leave the decision up to the maintainer. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
