On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2017-05-22 19:26, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 2017-05-22 19:20, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On 2017-05-22 19:12, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Jan Kiszka <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote:
>>>> And since there is no difference to the frequency the name is enough. >>>> So, I wouldn't go with this series as is. See above. >>> >>> Nope: Just like for the stmmac, we need to include the asset tags to >>> avoid matching variations of the devices which may carry the same board >>> name. While I will try to avoid that this happens, we are better safe >>> than sorry here. >> >> Do we have an issue right now? >> Yes / No > > Andy, we are trying to design a robust upstream driver here, no ad-hoc > BSP that will not survive the hardware anyway. You didn't answer my question... I do not see a good point to solve the issue that might happen in the future. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
