On 05/14/2017 03:56 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:47:38PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 03:02:35PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.18.53 release.
There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Sat May 13 13:02:15 UTC 2017.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

[ This is with v3.18.52-39-g710739d ]

Build results:
        total: 136 pass: 134 fail: 2
Failed builds:
        arm:allmodconfig
        arm:omap2plus_defconfig
Qemu test results:
        total: 111 pass: 96 fail: 15
Failed tests:
        arm:beagle:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-beagle
        arm:beaglexm:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-beagle-xm
        arm:overo:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-overo-tobi
        arm:sabrelite:multi_v7_defconfig:imx6dl-sabrelite
        arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
        arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1
        arm:vexpress-a15-a7:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7
        arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zc702
        arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zc706
        arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zed
        arm:midway:multi_v7_defconfig:ecx-2000
        arm:beagle:omap2plus_defconfig:omap3-beagle
        arm:beaglexm:omap2plus_defconfig:omap3-beagle-xm
        arm:overo:omap2plus_defconfig:omap3-overo-tobi
        powerpc:g3beige:nosmp:ppc_book3s_defconfig

Failure is still

arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-headsmp.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-headsmp.S:60: Error: bad instruction `badr r0,hyp_boot'

as reported earlier.

Ugh, I dropped the wrong arm patch from my queue :(

Ok, I think I've fixed it up now...


Maybe I am confused, and/or it is still too early, but linux-3.18.y in
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
now points to v3.18.52, ie the old version.

Guenter

Reply via email to