On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 02:40:38PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 20:02 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Turn the content of uuid_t into a union and add the fields for the v1 > > interpretation to it. > > In the branch it has fix for UUID() wrt union change, but there missed > similar for GUID().
Actually UUID needed this because uuid_t has a unіon inside, GUID should not need it because it doesn't. > While here, can we indent \ to be the same as of the rest lines in > macro(s) ? Sure.
