On Thursday 29 March 2007 18:18, Mike Galbraith wrote: > Rereading to make sure I wasn't unclear anywhere... > > On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 07:50 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > I don't see what a < 95% load really means. > > Egad. Here I'm pondering the numbers and light load as I'm typing, and > my fingers (seemingly independent when mind wanders off) typed < 95% as > in not fully committed, instead of "light".
95% of cases where load is less than 4; not 95% load. -- -ck - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
