* Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Try two instances of chew.c at _differing_ nice levels on one cpu on
> > mainline, and then SD. This is why you can't renice X on mainline.
>
> How about something more challenging instead :)
>
> The numbers below are from my scheduler tree with massive_intr running
> at nice 0, and chew at nice 5. Below these numbers are 100 lines from
> the exact center of chew's output.
>
> (interactivity remains intact with this rather heavy load)
looks interesting - could you send the patch?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
