On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 06/04/2017 18:27, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > Are you happy to take the arch_timer patches above? If yes, Marc can > > create a common branch with the first 5 patches which I will merge in > > the arm64 tree. You can then pull the whole series into your tree. > > Hi Catalin, > > I'm fine with the merge process you are proposing. But before going > forward, I would like to wait a bit in order to give the opportunity to > Thomas to review the patchset.
I'm fine with that. It's sad that we need to have a workaround framework for dealing with this, but silicon tinkerers seem to compete on providing the most broken implementation of an _architected_ timer. Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
