On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]> wrote: > In many of clk_disable() implementations, it is a no-op for a NULL > pointer input, but this is one of the exceptions. > > Making it treewide consistent will allow clock consumers to call > clk_disable() without NULL pointer check. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]> > --- > Applied to next/fixes-non-critical, thanks
Arnd
