Some NAND controllers are using DMA engine requiring a specific
buffer alignment.  The core provides no guarantee on the nand_buffers
pointers, which forces some drivers to allocate their own buffers
and pass the NAND_OWN_BUFFERS flag.

Rework the nand_buffers allocation logic to allocate each buffer
independently.  This should make most NAND controllers/DMA engine
happy, and allow us to get rid of these custom buf allocation in
NAND controller drivers.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>
---

Changes in v3:
  - Reword git-log

Changes in v2:
  - Newly added

 drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
index f828ad7..e9d3195 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
@@ -4613,13 +4613,25 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
        }
 
        if (!(chip->options & NAND_OWN_BUFFERS)) {
-               nbuf = kzalloc(sizeof(*nbuf) + mtd->writesize
-                               + mtd->oobsize * 3, GFP_KERNEL);
+               nbuf = kzalloc(sizeof(*nbuf), GFP_KERNEL);
                if (!nbuf)
                        return -ENOMEM;
-               nbuf->ecccalc = (uint8_t *)(nbuf + 1);
-               nbuf->ecccode = nbuf->ecccalc + mtd->oobsize;
-               nbuf->databuf = nbuf->ecccode + mtd->oobsize;
+               nbuf->ecccalc = kmalloc(mtd->oobsize, GFP_KERNEL);
+               if (!nbuf->ecccalc) {
+                       ret = -EINVAL;
+                       goto err_free;
+               }
+               nbuf->ecccode = kmalloc(mtd->oobsize, GFP_KERNEL);
+               if (!nbuf->ecccode) {
+                       ret = -EINVAL;
+                       goto err_free;
+               }
+               nbuf->databuf = kmalloc(mtd->writesize + mtd->oobsize,
+                                       GFP_KERNEL);
+               if (!nbuf->databuf) {
+                       ret = -EINVAL;
+                       goto err_free;
+               }
 
                chip->buffers = nbuf;
        } else {
@@ -4862,8 +4874,12 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
        /* Build bad block table */
        return chip->scan_bbt(mtd);
 err_free:
-       if (!(chip->options & NAND_OWN_BUFFERS))
+       if (!(chip->options & NAND_OWN_BUFFERS)) {
+               kfree(chip->buffers->databuf);
+               kfree(chip->buffers->ecccode);
+               kfree(chip->buffers->ecccalc);
                kfree(chip->buffers);
+       }
        return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_scan_tail);
@@ -4914,8 +4930,12 @@ void nand_cleanup(struct nand_chip *chip)
 
        /* Free bad block table memory */
        kfree(chip->bbt);
-       if (!(chip->options & NAND_OWN_BUFFERS))
+       if (!(chip->options & NAND_OWN_BUFFERS)) {
+               kfree(chip->buffers->databuf);
+               kfree(chip->buffers->ecccode);
+               kfree(chip->buffers->ecccalc);
                kfree(chip->buffers);
+       }
 
        /* Free bad block descriptor memory */
        if (chip->badblock_pattern && chip->badblock_pattern->options
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to