On 03/29/2017 12:28 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:21:33PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:


On 03/28/2017 10:48 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 09:12:05PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
The option 'show-total-period' works fine without a option '-l'.
But if running 'perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period',
you can see a problem showing only zero '0' for number of samples.

If you do that at that point, don't you have to change the TUI not to do
it again?

- Arnaldo


Yes, there isn't the same problem when using 't' on TUI of 'perf annotate'.
(As you know, 't' is show-total-period option)

Yeah, there is no problem on the TUI, but since you do it in a function
taht the TUI uses, it may not be needed to do this in

No, TUI don't use the function I modified in this patch at all.
(i.e. symbol__get_source_line())

Only symbol__tty_annotate() use symbol__get_source_line().

(As you know, annotate TUI use symbol__tui_annotate() )

tools/perf/util/annotate.c _and_ in tools/perf/ui/browsers/annotate.c,
right?

- Arnaldo


Are there something I missed or misunderstand ?

Thanks,
Taeung


In 'annotate' TUI, we can use the 't' functionality without the problem.
Because of the code (util/annotate.c:911 and ui/browsers/annotate.c:412) as
below.

 881 double disasm__calc_percent(struct annotation *notes, int evidx, s64
offset,
 882                             s64 end, const char **path, u64
*nr_samples)
 883 {
 ...
 910                 if (h->sum) {
 911                         *nr_samples = hits;

And,

 378 static void annotate_browser__calc_percent(struct annotate_browser
*browser,
 379                                            struct perf_evsel *evsel)
 380 {
 ...
 407                         bpos->samples[i].percent =
disasm__calc_percent(notes,
 408                                                 evsel->idx + i,
 409                                                 pos->offset,
 410                                                 next ? next->offset :
len,
 411                                                 &path, &nr_samples);
 412                         bpos->samples[i].nr = nr_samples;


And 'perf annotate --stdio --show-total-period' hasn't the problem, too.
Because of the same code (util/annotate.c:911).


But if with '-l', i.e. 'perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period',
the problem happen. Because 'nr' of source_line_samples aren't ordinarily
set
in symbol__get_source_line() (util/annotate.c:1634~..)
,so fix it as this patch

Are there something I missed or misunderstand ?


Thanks,
Taeung


Before:
    $ perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period
...
       0 :        400816:       push   %rbp
       0 :        400817:       mov    %rsp,%rbp
       0 :        40081a:       mov    %edi,-0x24(%rbp)
       0 :        40081d:       mov    %rsi,-0x30(%rbp)
       0 :        400821:       mov    -0x24(%rbp),%eax
       0 :        400824:       mov    -0x30(%rbp),%rdx
       0 :        400828:       mov    (%rdx),%esi
       0 :        40082a:       mov    $0x0,%edx
...

The reason is it was missed to set number of samples
of source_line_samples, so set it ordinarily.

After:
    $ perf annotate --stdio -l --show-total-period
...
       3 :        400816:       push   %rbp
       4 :        400817:       mov    %rsp,%rbp
       0 :        40081a:       mov    %edi,-0x24(%rbp)
       0 :        40081d:       mov    %rsi,-0x30(%rbp)
       1 :        400821:       mov    -0x24(%rbp),%eax
       2 :        400824:       mov    -0x30(%rbp),%rdx
       0 :        400828:       mov    (%rdx),%esi
       1 :        40082a:       mov    $0x0,%edx
...

Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com>
Cc: Martin Liska <mli...@suse.cz>
Fixes: 0c4a5bcea460 ("perf annotate: Display total number of samples with 
--show-total-period")
Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <treeze.tae...@gmail.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 6 ++++--
 tools/perf/util/annotate.h | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index 11af5f0..a37032b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -1665,7 +1665,7 @@ static int symbol__get_source_line(struct symbol *sym, 
struct map *map,
        start = map__rip_2objdump(map, sym->start);

        for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
-               u64 offset;
+               u64 offset, nr_samples;
                double percent_max = 0.0;

                src_line->nr_pcnt = nr_pcnt;
@@ -1674,12 +1674,14 @@ static int symbol__get_source_line(struct symbol *sym, 
struct map *map,
                        double percent = 0.0;

                        h = annotation__histogram(notes, evidx + k);
+                       nr_samples = h->addr[i];
                        if (h->sum)
-                               percent = 100.0 * h->addr[i] / h->sum;
+                               percent = 100.0 * nr_samples / h->sum;

                        if (percent > percent_max)
                                percent_max = percent;
                        src_line->samples[k].percent = percent;
+                       src_line->samples[k].nr = nr_samples;
                }

                if (percent_max <= 0.5)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.h b/tools/perf/util/annotate.h
index 09776b5..948aa8e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.h
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ struct cyc_hist {
 struct source_line_samples {
        double          percent;
        double          percent_sum;
-       double          nr;
+       u64             nr;
 };

 struct source_line {
--
2.7.4

Reply via email to