[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > It should be possible to do the same thing with a nice simple > concentrated PCI probe, instead of having stuff quite as spread out as > it used to be. That's the plan. > As to why it doesn't show any ISA interrupts, who knows... Some of > the PCI PCMCIA bridges need to be initialized. ISTR it worked fine in an x86 box. I'll play with it over the weekend. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Russell King
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) David Woodhouse
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) David Hinds
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) David Woodhouse
- 2.4's internal PCMCIA works for me (was Re: [PATCH] pcmcia... Barry K. Nathan
- Re: 2.4's internal PCMCIA works for me (was Re: [PATCH] pc... David Hinds
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) David Ford
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) David Hinds
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) David Ford
- Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) Linus Torvalds
- [FIXED!] Re: [PATCH] pcmcia event thread. (fwd) David Ford