Commit-ID:  8c8cb30f49b86333d8e036e1945cf1a78c03577e
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/8c8cb30f49b86333d8e036e1945cf1a78c03577e
Author:     Dou Liyang <douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 16:02:26 +0800
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:41:20 +0100

acpi/processor: Implement DEVICE operator for processor enumeration

ACPI allows to declare processors either with the PROCESSOR or with the
DEVICE operator. The current implementation handles only the PROCESSOR
operator.

On a system which uses the DEVICE operator for processor enumeration the
evaluation fails.

Check for the ACPI type of the ACPI handle and evaluate PROCESSOR and
DEVICE types separately.

Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong...@intel.com>
Cc: r...@rjwysocki.net
Cc: linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: guzhe...@huawei.com
Cc: izumi.t...@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: l...@kernel.org
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1488528147-2279-5-git-send-email-douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>

---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 5d208a9..9a98d7e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -633,25 +633,50 @@ static acpi_status __init 
acpi_processor_ids_walk(acpi_handle handle,
                                                  void **rv)
 {
        acpi_status status;
+       acpi_object_type acpi_type;
+       unsigned long long uid;
        union acpi_object object = { 0 };
        struct acpi_buffer buffer = { sizeof(union acpi_object), &object };
 
-       status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, NULL, NULL, &buffer);
+       status = acpi_get_type(handle, &acpi_type);
        if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
-               acpi_handle_info(handle, "Not get the processor object\n");
-       else
-               processor_validated_ids_update(object.processor.proc_id);
+               return false;
+
+       switch (acpi_type) {
+       case ACPI_TYPE_PROCESSOR:
+               status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, NULL, NULL, &buffer);
+               if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+                       goto err;
+               uid = object.processor.proc_id;
+               break;
+
+       case ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE:
+               status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_UID", NULL, &uid);
+               if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
+                       goto err;
+               break;
+       default:
+               goto err;
+       }
+
+       processor_validated_ids_update(uid);
+       return true;
+
+err:
+       acpi_handle_info(handle, "Invalid processor object\n");
+       return false;
 
-       return AE_OK;
 }
 
-static void __init acpi_processor_check_duplicates(void)
+void __init acpi_processor_check_duplicates(void)
 {
-       /* Search all processor nodes in ACPI namespace */
+       /* check the correctness for all processors in ACPI namespace */
        acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_PROCESSOR, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT,
                                                ACPI_UINT32_MAX,
                                                acpi_processor_ids_walk,
                                                NULL, NULL, NULL);
+       acpi_get_devices(ACPI_PROCESSOR_DEVICE_HID, acpi_processor_ids_walk,
+                                               NULL, NULL);
 }
 
 bool __init acpi_processor_validate_proc_id(int proc_id)

Reply via email to