On March 1, 2017 4:18:54 PM PST, "Dmitry V. Levin" <l...@altlinux.org> wrote:
>Replace size_t to fix the following asm/signal.h userspace compilation
>error:
>
>/usr/include/asm/signal.h:126:2: error: unknown type name 'size_t'
> size_t ss_size;
>
>size_t is replaced with __kernel_size_t in all cases except x32 where
>unsigned int has to be used instead.
>
>Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <l...@altlinux.org>
>---
>v2: create a separate patch for x86,
> replace size_t instead of including <stddef.h>.
>
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/signal.h | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/signal.h
>b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/signal.h
>index 8264f47..f80473f 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/signal.h
>+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/signal.h
>@@ -127,7 +127,11 @@ struct sigaction {
> typedef struct sigaltstack {
> void __user *ss_sp;
> int ss_flags;
>- size_t ss_size;
>+#if defined(__x86_64__) && defined(__ILP32__)
>+ unsigned int ss_size;
>+#else
>+ __kernel_size_t ss_size;
>+#endif
> } stack_t;
>
> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
Sounds like we still ought to make this a type by itself.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
