On 19/03/07, Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 19/03/07, Pekka J Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Micael,
>
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > Pekka, can you take a look at this problem and fix my initrd? :)
> >
> > GOOD
> > #
> > revoke-special-mmap-handling.patch
> > revoke-core-code.patch
> > revoke-core-code-misc-fixes.patch
> > revoke-core-code-fix-shared-mapping-revoke.patch
> > revoke-core-code-move-magic.patch
> > revoke-support-for-ext2-and-ext3.patch
> > revoke-add-documentation.patch
> > revoke-wire-up-i386-system-calls.patch
> > BAD
>
> Oh, sorry about that. Can you confirm that the patch
> revoke-special-mmap-handling.patch is bad?

Yes, revoke-special-mmap-handling.patch is bad.

+               if (unlikely(vma->vm_flags & VM_REVOKED))
+                       return -ENODEV;

Why -ENODEV?

Regards,
Michal

--
Michal K. K. Piotrowski
LTG - Linux Testers Group (PL)
(http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/ltg/)
LTG - Linux Testers Group (EN)
(http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/linux_testers_group_en/)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to