Em Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:50:56AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 03:24:35PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > util/pmu.c:948:28: error: address of array 'alias->unit' will always > > evaluate to 'true' [-Werror,-Wpointer-bool-conversion] > > if ((info->unit && alias->unit) || > > ~~ ~~~~~~~^~~~ > > util/pmu.c:953:13: error: address of array 'alias->unit' will always > > evaluate to 'true' [-Werror,-Wpointer-bool-conversion] > > if (alias->unit) > > ~~ ~~~~~~~^~~~ > > 2 errors generated. > > > > > > So, is this test about having something on that alias->unit array? I.e. > > should this suffice? > > yep, that seems right.. good catch
Thanks, adding your Acked-by then, ok? How about this other one: CC /tmp/build/perf/util/trace-event-info.o util/parse-events.y:699:6: error: conflicting types for 'parse_events_error' void parse_events_error(YYLTYPE *loc, void *data, ^ /tmp/build/perf/util/parse-events-bison.c:2224:7: note: previous implicit declaration is here yyerror (&yylloc, _data, scanner, YY_("syntax error")); ^ /tmp/build/perf/util/parse-events-bison.c:65:25: note: expanded from macro 'yyerror' #define yyerror parse_events_error ^ 1 error generated.