On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 06:56:22PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > That's because
No, what Mathias said.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
- [PATCH 0/6] struct cpuinfo_x86 related cleanups Mathias Krause
- [PATCH 1/6] x86: drop unneded members of struct cp... Mathias Krause
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86: drop unneded members of s... Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86: drop unneded members ... Mathias Krause
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86: drop unneded members ... Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86: drop unneded memb... Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86: drop unneded memb... H. Peter Anvin
- [PATCH 5/6] cris: remove unused wp_works_ok macro Mathias Krause
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] cris: remove unused wp_works_o... Jesper Nilsson
- [PATCH 3/6] x86/cpu: proc - remove "wp" ... Mathias Krause
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86/cpu: proc - remove "w... Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86/cpu: proc - remove &qu... Mathias Krause
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86/cpu: proc - remove... Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86/cpu: proc - remove "w... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86/cpu: proc - remove &qu... Borislav Petkov
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86/cpu: proc - remove &qu... Mathias Krause
