On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:26:20PM +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:
> Macro argument 'a' may be better as '(a)' to avoid precedence issues as
> reported by checkpatch.pl
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal <arushisinghal19971...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/fwserial/fwserial.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fwserial/fwserial.c 
> b/drivers/staging/fwserial/fwserial.c
> index 41a49c8194e5..bdfc0a8c7af3 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/fwserial/fwserial.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/fwserial/fwserial.c
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ struct fwtty_transaction {
>       };
>  };
>  
> -#define to_device(a, b)                      (a->b)
> +#define to_device((a), b)                    (a->b)

Really?  Why do we even have this macro at all?  Can it just be removed?

thanks,

greg k-h

Reply via email to