On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 02:14:37PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 23:45 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 02:36:58PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > [...] > > > > 2. Can it really return both TPM_RC_HANDLE and > > > > TPM_RC_REFERENCE_H0? > > > > > > Yes, it seems that a session that doesn't exist (because it's been > > > flushed) then it returns TPM_RC_REFERNCE_H0, but if the context has > > > a sequence mismatch (because it's been flushed and reloaded) then > > > we get TPM_RC_HANDLE. > > > > > > James > > > > If it is flushed, wouldn't you just get TPM_RC_REFERENCE_H0 when you > > try to TPM2_ContextLoad? The "and reloaded" does not make sense to > > me. Once a session is flushed it cannot be reloaded. > > > > Maybe you meant to say "beause it's been saved and reloaded"? That > > would make more sense and fits better what I see in the Commands > > specification. > > I mean if you load a prior context instead of the current one for an > existing handle, effectively a replay, you get TPM_RC_HANDLE. > > James
Thanks for clarifying this. /Jarkko
