On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 12:54:35AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> I -want- there to be only one hotplug strategy, but Adam seemed to be
> talking about the opposite, with his CONFIG_USB_HOTPLUG suggestion.
Here's Adam's proposal for CONFIG_USB_HOTPLUG:
http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/2571/250/4599696/
>From what I remember (and from looking at this message), all he seems to
want is to redefine the __init and __initdata macros depending on a
config item. There's no other grander scheme of things, right Adam?
Although such a small memory savings for turning a bus whose main goal
in life is to enable hot plugged devices into a fixed connection doesn't
seem worth it.
We are talking embedded USB hosts here, not devices. USB devices
running Linux is a whole 'nother thing, which I'm just now starting to
look into...
Comments Adam?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
greg@(kroah|wirex).com
http://immunix.org/~greg
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
