Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 12:29:15AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > If we are going to create CONFIG_USB_HOTPLUG, we must -eliminate-
> > CONFIG_HOTPLUG, and create CONFIG_PCI_HOTPLUG, and
> > CONFIG_ANOTHERBUS_HOTPLUG and so on, for each hotplug bus.
>
> Argh!
> I thought the whole point of this was to make there be only one hotplug
> strategy, due to the fact that this is a real need.
>
> Please let's not go down this path. It was all starting to look so
> nice...
I -want- there to be only one hotplug strategy, but Adam seemed to be
talking about the opposite, with his CONFIG_USB_HOTPLUG suggestion.
I'm hoping that Linus will disagree with the splintering of
CONFIG_HOTPLUG too...
I think it's too late in 2.4.x cycle to change now anyway.
Jeff
--
Jeff Garzik |
Building 1024 | The chief enemy of creativity is "good" sense
MandrakeSoft | -- Picasso
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
