On Tuesday 13 March 2007 04:03, Ryan Hope wrote: > I applied the detect-atomic-underflow patch and now I get these BUGs: > > BUG: atomic counter underflow at: > [<78167931>] page_add_file_rmap+0x41/0x50 > [<78161c7d>] __handle_mm_fault+0x53d/0x900 > [<78106de0>] do_IRQ+0x40/0x80 > [<7811ff99>] do_page_fault+0x129/0x630 > [<7811fe70>] do_page_fault+0x0/0x630 > [<784907f4>] error_code+0x7c/0x84 > ======================= > BUG: atomic counter underflow at: > [<78167931>] page_add_file_rmap+0x41/0x50 > [<78161c7d>] __handle_mm_fault+0x53d/0x900 > [<78106de0>] do_IRQ+0x40/0x80 > [<7811ff99>] do_page_fault+0x129/0x630 > [<7811fe70>] do_page_fault+0x0/0x630 > [<784907f4>] error_code+0x7c/0x84 > [<78490000>] rt_mutex_slowunlock+0x160/0x1c0 > ======================= > BUG: atomic counter underflow at: > [<78167931>] page_add_file_rmap+0x41/0x50 > [<78161c7d>] __handle_mm_fault+0x53d/0x900 > [<78106de0>] do_IRQ+0x40/0x80 > [<7811ff99>] do_page_fault+0x129/0x630 > [<7811fe70>] do_page_fault+0x0/0x630 > [<784907f4>] error_code+0x7c/0x84 > [<78490000>] rt_mutex_slowunlock+0x160/0x1c0 > ======================= > BUG: atomic counter underflow at: > [<78167931>] page_add_file_rmap+0x41/0x50 > [<78161c7d>] __handle_mm_fault+0x53d/0x900 > [<78106de0>] do_IRQ+0x40/0x80 > [<7811ff99>] do_page_fault+0x129/0x630 > [<7811fe70>] do_page_fault+0x0/0x630 > [<784907f4>] error_code+0x7c/0x84 > [<78490000>] rt_mutex_slowunlock+0x160/0x1c0 > ======================= > BUG: atomic counter underflow at: > [<78167931>] page_add_file_rmap+0x41/0x50 > [<78161c7d>] __handle_mm_fault+0x53d/0x900 > [<78106de0>] do_IRQ+0x40/0x80 > [<7811ff99>] do_page_fault+0x129/0x630 > [<7811fe70>] do_page_fault+0x0/0x630 > [<784907f4>] error_code+0x7c/0x84 > [<78490000>] rt_mutex_slowunlock+0x160/0x1c0 > ======================= > BUG: atomic counter underflow at: > [<78167931>] page_add_file_rmap+0x41/0x50 > [<78161c7d>] __handle_mm_fault+0x53d/0x900 > [<78106de0>] do_IRQ+0x40/0x80 > [<7811ff99>] do_page_fault+0x129/0x630 > [<7811fe70>] do_page_fault+0x0/0x630 > [<784907f4>] error_code+0x7c/0x84 > [<78490000>] rt_mutex_slowunlock+0x160/0x1c0 > ======================= > BUG: atomic counter underflow at: > [<78167931>] page_add_file_rmap+0x41/0x50 > [<78161c7d>] __handle_mm_fault+0x53d/0x900 > [<78106de0>] do_IRQ+0x40/0x80 > [<7811ff99>] do_page_fault+0x129/0x630 > [<7811fe70>] do_page_fault+0x0/0x630 > [<784907f4>] error_code+0x7c/0x84 > [<78490000>] rt_mutex_slowunlock+0x160/0x1c0 > ======================= > > On 3/12/07, Ryan Hope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am currently running RSDL v0.30 on 2.6.21-rc2-mm2. I get these (what > > seem to me as random) bug messages from dmesg; they are non fatal. I'm > > not quite sure if this bug is a result of changes I have made on top of > > RSDL; is this because of bad code I introduced or is the code that I > > introduced exposing a bug in RSDL? The BUGs from dmesg are shown below. > > If you need more info let me know. > >
Not an RSDL bug, thanks. -- -ck - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
