Daniel,
At 09:23 AM 11/14/00, you wrote:
I reserve the right to make coding errors, thanks for not letting it get
written into history :-)
I'm not going to give up my right to make errors until I'm ready to give up
my keyboard. I'll probably be pushing up daisies at that point in my life.
How about:
for ( ... ) if (!isalnum(*p) && !strchr("-_", *p)) return -EINVAL;
I think that is correct. However, it fails the "easy to understand"
criterion, so I don't like it.]
David
--------------------------------------------------------
David Relson Osage Software Systems, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 514 W. Keech Ave.
www.osagesoftware.com Ann Arbor, MI 48103
voice: 734.821.8800 fax: 734.821.8800
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Malcolm Beattie
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Chris Evans
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Keith Owens
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Nick Holloway
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit David Woodhouse
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Horst von Brand
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Peter Samuelson
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Daniel Phillips
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Daniel Phillips
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit David Relson
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Horst von Brand
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Alan Cox
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Keith Owens
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Torsten Duwe
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Alan Cox

