[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Torsten Duwe) writes: > Chris Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What's wrong with isalnum() ? > > Hm, must admit that I wasn't 100% sure if that's in the kernel lib or an evil > gcc expands it inline to some static array lookup. Now I see that it's > already in the kernel. Do some of you also sometimes wonder why the kernel is > so big ;-) ? Someone could make it a bit smaller by patching fs/jffs/interp.c and arch/ppc/xmon/xmon.c to use the kernel lib, rather than their own versions. -- `O O' | [EMAIL PROTECTED] // ^ \\ | http://www.pyrites.org.uk/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Chris Evans
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Jan Dvorak
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Torsten Duwe
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Peter Samuelson
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Keith Owens
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Florian Weimer
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Malcolm Beattie
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Chris Evans
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Keith Owens
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Nick Holloway
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit David Woodhouse
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Horst von Brand
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Peter Samuelson
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Daniel Phillips
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Daniel Phillips
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit David Relson
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Horst von Brand
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Alan Cox
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Modprobe local root exploit Keith Owens