Am 03.01.2017 um 15:31 schrieb Augusto Mecking Caringi: > When UBIFS_FS_ENCRYPTION is selected and BLOCK is not set, the following > warning is given: > > warning: (UBIFS_FS_ENCRYPTION) selects FS_ENCRYPTION which has unmet > direct dependencies (BLOCK) > > Fix it by making BLOCK a dependency of UBIFS_FS_ENCRYPTION. > > Signed-off-by: Augusto Mecking Caringi <augustocari...@gmail.com> > --- > fs/ubifs/Kconfig | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig > index 0a908ae..e9d7780 100644 > --- a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig > +++ b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ config UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT > config UBIFS_FS_ENCRYPTION > bool "UBIFS Encryption" > depends on UBIFS_FS > + depends on BLOCK > select FS_ENCRYPTION > default n > help >
This is currently being addressed, please see discussions around: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/12/19/161 and https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/12/16/118 Thanks, //richard
