On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:30:09AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > All this code seems to be largely a copy-paste of the bytcr_rt5640 machine > driver and the same comments would apply there. This patch did miss the last
Yes, there's a lot of room for cleanups in the existing code too (and of course if there's such a large amount of cut'n'paste that implies that there should be some code reuse going on). > correction merged by Mark to deal with errors "ASoC: Intel: bytcr_rt5640: > fallback mechanism if MCLK is not enabled" and the same error handling would > be needed. There was a cut back version of it I thought?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
