On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 11:11:27AM +0100, yegorsli...@googlemail.com wrote: > From: Yegor Yefremov <yegorsli...@googlemail.com> > > 'include' was missing from path. > > Signed-off-by: Yegor Yefremov <yegorsli...@googlemail.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti-syscon-reset.txt | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti-syscon-reset.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti-syscon-reset.txt > index 164c7f3..5b20e20 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti-syscon-reset.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/ti-syscon-reset.txt > @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Required properties: > reset status register > Cell #7 : Flags used to control reset behavior, > availible flags defined in the DT include > - file <dt-bindings/reset/ti-syscon.h> > + file > <include/dt-bindings/reset/ti-syscon.h>
There's pretty much equal mixture of include or not. Not really much point in fixing 1 instance if there's no clear correct way. Given it is written with <...>, that matches how you write the include statement. Rob