On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavall...@st.com> wrote:
First of all, +1 to (re-)use stmmac. > The stmmac drivers run since many years on several platforms > (sh4, stm32, arm, x86, mips ...) and it supports an huge of amount of > configurations starting from 3.1x to 3.7x databooks. As Intel employee who did some clean ups to that, acknowledge above. > Concerning the stmicro/stmmac naming, these come from a really old > story and have no issue to adopt new folder/file names. I don't think it would be best idea for platform driver (though we can keep driver's name in the structure in async with file name). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
