On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 09:51:03PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > On 11/24/2016 04:10 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:27:37PM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote: > > > Unlike the device driver support for TPM 1.2, the TPM 2.0 does > > > not support the securityfs pseudo files for displaying the > > > firmware event log. > > > > > > This patch enables support for providing the TPM 2.0 event log in > > > binary form. TPM 2.0 event log supports a crypto agile format that > > > records multiple digests, which is different from TPM 1.2. This > > > patch enables the tpm_bios_log_setup for TPM 2.0 and adds the > > > event log parser which understand the TPM 2.0 crypto agile format. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <na...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > I don't want to say much about this before I've tested it. I wonder > > what cheap hardware I could use to test this. Any advice is on this > > from anyone is much appreciated. > > Virtual hardware would be cheap :-) > > I tested this series with QEMU + vTPM + SeaBIOS with TPM 1.2 + TPM 2 support > (basing the log on ACPI). I had to fix an endianess issue on the SeaBIOS > side, which made it work. So for this version of the patches I can give it > my tested-by: > > Tested-by: Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thanks. /Jarkko
